• Jan 20, 2026
  • 0 comments

CCA Rhapsody - Smoothness and Fun Directed by Switches

Pros
- Fun, and addictive tuning that is perfect for everyone loving some added bass and smooth treble (also treble sensitive people)
- Great timbre and good cohesiveness given the hybrid configuration
- Fairly easy to drive
- Switches make them versatile
Cons
- Soundstage, resolution, imaging and detail retrieval could be better
- Fierce competition that boast better technical performance at similar prices
- Bulky shells make them a no-go for people with small ears
- Could include a slightly better stock cable

Introduction

 

CCA has always been “the handsome sister brand” of KZ, famous for bringing products g more balanced and better sounding tunings with respect to their strongly V-Shaped counterparts.

The CCA Rhapsody are among the latest releases from the brand, featuring 6 drivers per side (2 DD + 4 BA) and tuning switches, and has already received some good reviews online. Thanks to Jenny from KZ, I can hear these and also took some notes to share.

20240103_163729.jpg

Technical Specifications

 

  • Driver Configuration → Hybrid (2 DD + 4 x BA)
  • Impedance → 8 Ω
  • Sensitivity → 108dB
  • Effective Frequency Response Range → 20Hz-20kHz
  • Cable → 1,20m 5N copper silver plated cable with 0.78mm 2-PIN connectors
  • Plug Type → straight gold plated 3.5mm jack connector

Packaging

 

Nothing new under the sunlight as the Rhapsody come with the same packaging as older KZ and CCA products:

  • The CCA Rhapsody
  • One set of starline eartips (S, M, L)
  • The detachable 3.5mm cable with 0.78mm 2-PIN QDC connectors
  • A SIM Card removal needle (needed to move the switches)
  • User manuals and instructions

 

20240103_162439.jpg

 

20240103_162521.jpg

 

20240103_162705 (1).jpg

 

20240103_163428.jpg

 

Design and Build Quality

 

The CCA Rhapsody are larger and taller than average, with a thick shell that hides a multi-driver setup and tuning switches. The dark-silver faceplate is glossy and elegant, and the “Rhapsody” name isn’t ugly to see (which is good news) and there’s a hole on the faceplate with a visible grill, even though I’m not sure if it’s an open vent or if it’s just a decorative part of the shell.


The switches are located on one side of the IEM, but the reason why the switch panel is not symmetrical between the two IEMs is unknown to me.


The nozzle is not as wide as on other sets but it’s not a small nozzle either.


Overall, the Rhapsody are built very well with no major assembly flaws and they also feel very sturdy and well built to the touch.

 

20240103_163222 (1).jpg

 

20240103_163203.jpg

 

20240103_163122.jpg

 

20240103_163100.jpg

 

20240103_163007 (1).jpg

 

20240103_163038.jpg

 

Cable

 

The stock cable is, unfortunately, nothing to write home about. It’s the same cable that KZ and CCA have been including for ages now, and even though it’s not as bad as the one they used to provide in the past, I still think a small effort to include an even better cable could be done.

 

20240103_162859 (1).jpg

 

Comfort and Isolation

 

Comfort can be good or bad depending on the size of the ears: those who have small ears will likely have some comfort issues overtime, mostly related to the size of the shells (including their thickness), whereas others will find them sitting in a stable and comfortable way in their ears.


Isolation is more than enough for outdoor listening sessions.

Sound

 

GEAR USED FOR THE TEST

 

  • DAC: Topping E30
  • AMP: Topping L30
  • Mobile phones: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Xiaomi Mi A3, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
  • Moondrop May’s DSP cable with PEQ=0
  • Dongle: Apple Type-C dongle, Truthear SHIO
  • Portable DAPs: Benjie S8/AGPTEK M30B
  • Other sources: Presonus AudioBox iONE, Elgato Wave XLR, KZ AZ10

 

Do they need an amplifier?


The CCA Rhapsody don’t need an amplifier, but giving them some juice is not a bad idea. I’ve noticed a bit better low-end tightness when connecting them to a proper amp.


Sound signature


The sound signature depends on the switches’ positions. The first two switches have impact on the bass, the other two twitches have impact on mid&high frequencies. Basically, setting the first bass switch in the UP position increases the low end, but if the second bass switch is also switched in the UP position, then the bass increases even more. Same applies for the mid&highs switches.


There are many possibilities and one can really try playing with them, but this review will be based on the DDUU combination, which basically avoids too much bass emphasis or a subdued upper range by following the Harman target more or less.


Moving the switches in different ways by starting from this position helped me understanding the various effects of the switches, but your mileage may vary of course.

 

Lows


The low-end is solid with average extension, a pleasant yet limited rumble and a very punchy bass that is more forward than the sub-bass. The bass is not the tightest or the fastest around, and the textures are only average, but it sounds very impactful in a pleasant way. I think these will be perfect for bassheads since there’s already a good amount of bass in the DDUU config and the switches really make the bass even more powerful, deeper and punchier.


For sure these are not for those seeking for neutrality, especially because they already have emphasized bass even in the switches’ combination with the least amount of low-end.

Mids


The lower midrange is slightly compressed between the emphasized bass and the upper midrange, and even though this happens, it still has some pleasant warmth that brings some character to male vocals (even though they don’t really “stand out”). The upper midrange is forward, just like on most Harman-ish sets, and although some instances of sibilance are still a thing, they don’t occur very often and aren’t unbearable, also thanks to the fact that the treble is gently roll-off providing more smoothness.

Highs


As said some lines above, the treble is rolled-off but still has enough energy to make good contrast with the low-end, providing a very engaging and dynamic sound. And good news, BA timbre is not a thing in most cases (even though it can pop-up at very high volumes and while listening to genres that require more treble such as metal).


The detail retrieval and resolution are below average for the price but the overall sound is very smooth and cohesive also thanks to the treble tuning. In addition, if we put the switches into the equation, then it’s easy to understand that everyone, including those who are sensitive to treble, has a chance to like these.

Soundstage is average and so is the imaging.

 

My favorite combination of the various switches: UUUU.

 

The UUUU combination has a more controlled midbass, more sub-bass extension and rumble, a bit less subdued lower mids and slightly better timbre overall. The other frequencies remain basically the same, so it’s more of a personal preference than anything else.

 

Some comparisons:

 

CCA Rhapsody DDUU vs TRI Star River DD (Balanced and Natural position)

 

Both have switches but the Rhapsody has even more, thus giving more combinations of up and down positions.

Overall, the Rhapsody are a lot better in terms of tonality, timbre and cohesiveness even though they are a hybrid set. The Star River has a bit more sub-bass extension with respect to the DDUU config of the Rhapsody, even though the latter can easily compensate by using the UUUU config. Going up top, the Rhapsody are more natural too and can be used also by those who are sensitive to treble, whereas the Star River are bright even in the least bright config, even though they have better details, resolution, imaging and soundstage.
The Rhapsody are more refined and pleasant to the ears, the Star River are more technical but way less pleasant and fun to listen to.

Both are well built, very comfortable and insulate well from external noises and both come with average cables, but the Star River come with a much better set of tips (since they also include TRI Clarion eartips).

If someone told me to choose only one of the two, I’d get the Rhapsody without thinking twice.

CCA Rhapsody UUUU vs CCA CRA

 

To compare them in a fair way, the Rhapsody have been set to UUUU combination.
The low-end is perceived as more emphasized on the Rhapsody but this is just because they have less treble than the CRA. The CRA, instead, have better treble extension, more details, better resolution. Soundstage and imaging are slightly better on the CRA.

From a tonal perspective, the CRA are very bright so they are a no-go for those who are sensitive to treble, whereas the Rhapsody are very versatile and usable even in their brightest switches’ combination. In fact, the biggest step up from the average KZ/CCA set is the timbre, which is greatly improved on the Rhapsody.

Both are well built and the CRA are more comfortable but the Rhapsody insulate better from external noises. Both come with very average cables, to say the least.
I would probably pick the CRA for the brighter signature since I like a more sparkling upper-end, but I think the Rhapsody are more refined and easier to recommend to anyone.

CCA Rhapsody DDUU vs Celest Wyvern Pro

 

Both are Harman-ish but the Rhapsody are more fun, warmer and bassier overall, while the Wyvern Pro are technically superior and more balanced with better end-to-end extension.
They have more mid-bass quantity and punch, slightly warmer male vocals, and a touch less forward upper-midrange. The Wyvern Pro have less midbass that is also faster and more accurate, slightly more subdued male vocals and more forward and energetic female vocals. The treble extension is decent on both but the Wyvern Pro are slightly superior and more resolving due to the fact that their midbass is not as prominent as on the Rhapsody.
Soundstage and imaging are a lot better on the Wyvern Pro.

Build quality is very good on both. Comfort is very subjective since both have something that could make them tricky to keep in the ears: the Wyvern Pro have a protruding wing on the shell, whereas the Rhapsody have very bulky shells. The Wyvern Pro come with a better cable.

If I were asked to pick one, I’d choose the Wyvern Pro any day, but I also understand those who like a lot of bass will find the Rhapsody a more interesting set from a timbrical point of view.

Final Thoughts

 

CCA has really done wonders with the overall cohesiveness and timbre of the Rhapsody: they are fun, warm, pleasant to listen to, easy to drive and versatile thanks to the switches. I think this is the best driver implementation KZ has done to date, especially considering that there are multiple drivers that come into play.
Where do they fall? Soundstage, imaging, resolution and detail retrieval aren’t their “forte”. They are not bad under those aspects, but since there are lots of IEMs that are technically capable in this price range it’s time for KZ and CCA to step up on that, especially now that they have reached enough confidence with the tuning and that they have shown (i.e. with the Duo) that they can make technically competent stuff for cheap.

I am pleased to recommend the Rhapsody, but only if you are able to buy them for around their launch price or discounted price (i.e. around 30$): that is a very good price for them and they are definitely worth that money if you want a fun and smooth sounding set and are not bothered by their bulky shell.
40% off shopping link at keephifi:
Leave a comment